The appellant appealed a disposition of the Ontario Review Board ordering his detention.
It was uncontested that the appellant posed a significant threat to public safety, precluding an absolute discharge.
The Court of Appeal found the Board's conclusion that a detention order was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition was fully supported by the evidence and free of legal error.
Fresh evidence indicated the appellant was incapable of consenting to treatment, making a conditional discharge unavailable.
The appeal was dismissed.
