The defendants brought a motion to strike the plaintiffs' statement of claim, arguing it disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was an abuse of process, and was statute-barred.
The plaintiffs had previously commenced an identical action regarding a terminated bingo hall lease on First Nation reserve lands, which was dismissed for delay.
The court agreed with the defendants, finding the second action was an abuse of process attempting to re-litigate the dismissed claims.
The court also held the lease was void ab initio under the Indian Act and the claims were subject to the two-year limitation period.
The motion to strike was granted without leave to amend.