The defendant insurer brought a motion under Rule 32 for an order permitting its appraiser and experts to inspect the plaintiffs' property, which had suffered fire damage.
The plaintiffs opposed the timing of the inspection, arguing it should occur after the ongoing appraisal process concluded and that the request was delayed.
The court granted the motion, finding no undue delay and noting that the defendant had not inspected the property since the action commenced.
However, the court prohibited one of the defendant's proposed experts from attending due to allegations that they had previously caused additional damage to the property.
No costs were awarded.
