A sales representative sued for commission arising from an exceptionally large pandemic-related order placed within his exclusive territory.
The employer argued that an internal notice limiting commissions and a later bonus agreement reduced the representative’s entitlement.
The court held that the original commission agreement did not permit unilateral alteration by notice, but the representative subsequently signed a bonus agreement accepting a reduced payment.
Although the agreement was harsh and the bargaining power unequal, the evidence did not establish coercion, duress, or unconscionability sufficient to invalidate the contract.
The representative’s claim for full commission failed and the bonus agreement governed.
