The accused was charged with multiple firearms offences following a daytime shootout in downtown Hamilton.
The Crown relied on circumstantial evidence, including cell phone videos, clothing, and the recovery of the firearm near the accused's arrest location, to establish identity.
The court found the circumstantial evidence cumulatively proved the accused was the shooter beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court rejected the accused's claim of self-defence, finding that discharging a firearm in a busy residential area was not an objectively reasonable response.
The accused was found guilty on all counts.
