Following a prior costs endorsement, self-represented respondents sought leave to file a reply and requested reconsideration of the court’s costs determination.
The underlying application sought a declaration regarding the validity of several leases and had been dismissed, resulting in success for the respondents.
The self-represented respondents argued they should receive compensation for time spent preparing and attending the proceeding.
Applying Rule 57.04(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and the principles in Fong v. Chan, the court held that costs for self-represented litigants are only appropriate where the work performed is equivalent to that ordinarily done by counsel.
The court found the respondents’ activities did not meet that threshold and declined to alter the previous costs award.
