

This decision addresses the continuation of the parties' motions regarding interim parenting arrangements for their young child. The mother sought a varied schedule and blanket consent for travel, while the father sought significantly expanded parenting time. The court found the father's proposal overly ambitious and the mother's unduly cautious. Balancing the child's need for stability with the benefit of increased time with the father, the court ordered an alternating weekend schedule with additional mid-week time for the father when he is in the London area. The mother was also granted permission to travel with the child to visit family in Michigan without the father's consent, subject to reasonable notice. Exchange locations were established to balance the transportation burden.