COURT FILE NO.: FS-13-76817-00

DATE: 2021 11 15

ONTARIO

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

B E T W E E N:

K.K.

Gary Joseph and Vivian Merklinger, counsel for the Applicant

Applicant

• and -

M.M.

Aida Pasha, counsel for the Respondent

Respondent

SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Justice C. Petersen

Introduction

[1] This ruling deals only with the issues of retrospective[^1] spousal support, prospective spousal support, and security for the Applicant’s support obligations. It should be read in conjunction with my Reasons for Judgment in this case, dated June 1, 2021: K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONSC 3975.

[2] In my Reasons for Judgment, at paragraphs 873-878, I found that M.M. was entitled to spousal support on both a compensatory and non-compensatory basis. I also concluded, at paragraphs 879-881, that it would be inconsistent with the objectives of the spousal support provisions in the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.), to terminate K.K.’s spousal support payments at this time. I then included the following paragraphs:

[882] Although they are neither legislated nor binding on this Court, the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG) are a useful tool in assisting the court to determine the appropriate amount and duration of spousal support: Gray, at para. 42. The application of the SSAG in