Court File and Parties

COURT FILE NO.: CV-19-616000

DATE: 20201023

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

BETWEEN:

THERALASE TECHNOLOGIES INC., ROGER DUMOULIN-WHITE and KRISTINA HACHEV

Plaintiffs

– and –

CHARLES LANTER also known as CASHFLOW, MICHAEL BOROVEC, also known as PINKOCAPITALIST2, JOHN DOE NO. 1 also known as LAZERR00, JOHN DOE NO. 2, also known as PENNYOILKING, JOHN DOE NO. 3, also known as BLUEBOMBER6, JOHN DOE No. 4, also known as BIONICJOE, JOHN DOE NO. 5, also known as MACMAN1519, JOHN DOE NO. 6, also known as NASTYNASTA, JOHN DOE NO. 7, also known as NEED2KNOW68, JOHN DOE NO. 8, also known as TRUENORTHSTRONG, JOHN DOE NO. 9, also known as TUESDAYNIGHTRID, and JOHN DOE NO. 10, also known as CRAZYTRADER12

Defendants

BEFORE: F.L. Myers J.

COUNSEL: Sarah J. Erskine and Shannon Bennett, for the Plaintiffs

HEARD: October 23, 2020

CASE CONFERENCE endorsement

[1] The plaintiffs seek to schedule a motion to amend the title of proceedings arising from my decision dated January 13, 2020 reported at 2020 ONSC 205.

[2] A motion is scheduled before me on November 27, 2020 for two hours.

[3] In addition to any other manner of service authorized by the Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg. 194, the plaintiffs may serve their motion material on the defendants by email. Service is effective the next day after the email is sent. No acknowledgement of receipt is required.

[4] However, the plaintiffs’ proof of service should include particulars of the basis upon which the plaintiffs seek a finding that any defendant served by email likely has received notice of the proceeding through the email address utilized.

Date: October 23, 2020