COURT FILE NO.: 13-56958
DATE: 20200603
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
RE: SUSAN TATARYN and SUSAN G. TATARYN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiffs
-and-
AXA INSURANCE CANADA (now known as INTACT INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA), CHARLES McLEOD, IRVIN HOFFMAN and COHEN & LORD INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED, Defendants
BEFORE: Mr. Justice Pierre E. Roger
COUNSEL: Brian C. Elkin, for the Plaintiffs
Christopher Reil and Ashlee Barber, for the Defendant, AXA INSURANCE COMPANY (now Intact)
Mark Charron and Jaime Wilson, for the Defendant, CHARLES MCLEOD
Pasquale Santini, for the Defendants, IRVIN HOFFMAN AND COHEN & LORD INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED
Additional costs endorsEment
[1] Following the release of my costs endorsement, counsel for the plaintiff wrote to the Court asking that I reconsider parts of my decision on costs as he argues that I omitted to deal with elements of his clients’ discovery requests.
[2] However, I did assess the costs of the plaintiffs’ motions for further discovery. This should have been apparent from paragraphs 4 (a) and 10 of my written reasons. I did not deal with these more specifically because they were not as much the focus of the arguments on costs raised by the unsuccessful defendants.
[3] In any event, in my earlier decision and analysis, I regrouped all production issues under one title and dealt with the costs of all of these under that title.
[4] There is therefore no need to receive further submissions or to reconsider my earlier decision on costs. It deals with the costs of all motions argued earlier before me in this matter.
Mr. Justice Pierre Roger
Date: June 3, 2020
COURT FILE NO.: 13-56958
DATE: 20200603
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
RE: SUSAN TATARYN and SUSAN G. TATARYN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiffs
-and-
AXA INSURANCE CANADA, (known as INTACT INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA), CHARLES McLEOD, IRVIN HOFFMAN and COHEN & LORD INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED, Defendants
BEFORE: Mr. Justice Pierre Roger
Additional costs ENDORSEMENT
Roger J.
Released: June 3, 2020