COURT FILE NO.: CV-10-400035/08-CV-352871/08-CV-364585/ 04-CV-279726/CV-14-515899/CV-18-594948/CV-16-544153/ CV-16-564078/CV-14-515899 various
DATE: 20181001
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
RE: Peoples Trust Company, David Brooker, Taras Kulish, Moses Muyal, Michael Harold Kimberly, Stancer Gossin Rose, Blair Coleman Rose, Raymond Stancer, Mitchell Hart Rose, Rose and Rose, Blair Coleman Rose, Scott Kelly, Ron Hatcher, Steinberg Morton Frymer LLP, Rahul Shastri, Ira T. Kagan, David Winer, David Sloan, Baker Schneider Ruggiero, Patrice Côté, Michael John Mitchell, Nicholas Carlos Canizares, David Hart, Bresver Scheininger & Chapman LLP, Rui Ruivo, Frank Pa, Atlantic (HS) Financial Corporation, Tom Pires, Megacorp, Krishnan Chahal and Nutan Chahal, Plaintiffs
AND:
Nadire Atas and 626381 Ontario Limited, Defendants
AND RE: Dale & Lessman LLP, Robert E. Dale, David E. Mende, Christina J. Wallis, Kagan Shastri LLP, Rahul Shastri, David Winer, Stancer Gossin Rose LLP, Raymond Stancer, Eric Gossin, Mitchell Rose, Garth Dingwall, Ralph Steinberg, J. David Sloan, Peoples Trust Company, Derek Peddelesden, Frank Renou, Martin Mallich and Sharon Small, Plaintiffs
AND:
Nadire Atas and 626381 Ontario Limited, Defendants
BEFORE: Corbett J.
COUNSEL: Christina J. Wallis, for Peoples Trust and the Chahals
Gary M. Caplan, for Applicants other than Peoples Trust and the Chahals
Yoginder Gulia, for Krishnan and Nutal Chahal
D. Yiokaris for David Sloan and Baker Schneider
A. Pantel, for various LawPro defendants
Nadire Atas, self-represented and for 626381 Ontario Limited
HEARD: October 1, 2018
BEFORE: D.L. Corbett J. (In Writing)
ENDORSEMENT
[1] In response to my endorsement of September 28, 2018, Ms Atas has written to the court requesting a decision on her Chavali request to bring a stand-alone recusal motion, and for an emergency case management conference.
[2] I have decided Ms Atas’ Chavali request, as set out in my endorsement of September 28, 2018. Ms Atas may bring her recusal issues forward in response to the motion for an interlocutory injunction. The court will deal with the recusal issues on that motion, on the state of the record as it then exists, and if Ms Atas fails to pursue the issue, as directed, she should not expect to be permitted to pursue it subsequently. To be clear, this court, not Ms Atas, decides the process to be followed here.
[3] I have dismissed Ms Atas’ request for a stand-alone motion that I recuse myself, for the reasons given in my endorsement of September 28, 2018.
[4] The request for an emergency case management conference is denied. Ms Atas has not raised any issue for such a conference, urgent or otherwise.
D.L. Corbett J.
Date: October 1, 2018