Menno v. Menno, CITATION: 2018 ONSC 2858
COURT FILE NO.: 5512/14
DATE: 2018-05-07
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO
RE: Sandy Harold Menno, Applicant
AND: Barbara Joan Menno
BEFORE: Mr Justice Ramsay
COUNSEL: Ronald N. Brady for the Applicant; Paul Heath for the Respondent
HEARD: April 16 – 18, 2018 at St Catharines
ENDORSEMENT
[1] The Applicant opposed approval of the Respondent’s accounts as attorney and executrix for their father. The Respondent was entirely successful. There is now nothing left in the estate as a result of the court order and previous disbursements that were made with consent of the parties. Both parties ask for costs.
[2] There is no reason to order costs from the estate.
[3] In both cases, the Respondent was successful and should have partial indemnity. I order the Applicant to pay costs to the Respondent, which I fix at $20,000. For a three day trial that strikes me as an amount that would have been contemplated. It is about two-thirds of the Applicant’s own bill of costs.
J.A. Ramsay J.
Date: 2018-05-07

