Court File and Parties

COURT FILE NO.: FC-08-980-2 DATE: 2017/07/06 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

BETWEEN:

Thomas Hicks Applicant – and – Suzy Sbardella Respondent

Counsel: Self-represented (for the Applicant) Audra Bennett, for the Respondent

HEARD: In writing

SUPPLEMENTARY ENDORSEMENT

Section 7 expenses

[1] By a series of emails, the parties have sought to clarify and reargue the part of the motion dealing with Section 7 expenses. My decision was based on the section 7 expenses as they existed and were submitted to me.

[2] Upon a review of my decision, I incorrectly stated at paragraph 66 that volleyball expenses were not Section 7 expenses while in paragraph 69, I concluded that they were. My intention was to include such expenses.

[3] I agree with the father that Manotick Massage was not to be included as a Section 7 expense.

[4] Consequently, the sum of $228 for Manotick Massage will be deleted from the sum owing reducing the amount to $3,036.49 to be paid by July 7, 2017.

Shelston J.

Released: July 6, 2017