The appellant was convicted of sexual assault and sexual interference against two young sisters.
He appealed his conviction, arguing the trial judge erred in dismissing his application for third-party records from the Children's Aid Society (CAS) and in making credibility determinations.
He also sought leave to appeal his sentence.
The majority of the Court of Appeal set aside the convictions and ordered a new trial, finding that the CAS records were likely relevant to credibility and motive to fabricate and should have been reviewed by the trial judge.
The sentence appeal was dismissed.
