CITATION: Mudry v. Mudry, 2016 ONSC 5378
COURT FILE NO.: FC-14-2516
DATE: 20160825
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
RE: DANIELLE SYLVIE MUDRY, Applicant
AND
ROBIN MARTIN MUDRY, Respondent
BEFORE: Mr. Justice Robert N. Beaudoin
COUNSEL: Alice Weatherston, for the Applicant
Lisa Sharp, for the Respondent
HEARD: By written submissions
costs ENDORSEMENT
[1] Each party seeks recovery of their costs for the motion heard on June 16, 2012. The Applicant sought an order seeking a change in the exchange time for their daughter Danielle. The Respondent sought leave to abridge the timelines for the service of an expert report before trial and to increase child support to $998 per month.
[2] I granted the relief sought by the Applicant and I dismissed the Respondent’s motion with respect to the expert’s report and ordered the Applicant to pay child support in the amount of $650 per month.
[3] The issue of the expert report did not take up a great deal of time. While I conclude that the Respondent was unreasonable on the exchange time issue, the Applicant should have recognized that an increase in child support was inevitable. I conclude that overall success on the motion was divided and I decline to make an order for costs in favour of either party.
Mr. Justice Robert N. Beaudoin
Date: August 25, 2016
CITATION: Murdy v. Murdy, 2016 ONSC 5378
COURT FILE NO.: FC-14-2516
DATE: 20160825
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
RE: DANIELLE SYLVIE MUDRY, Applicant
AND
ROBIN MARTIN MUDRY, Respondent
BEFORE: Mr. Justice Robert N. Beaudoin
COUNSEL: Alice Weatherston, for the Applicant
Lisa Sharp, for the Respondent
costs ENDORSEMENT
Beaudoin J.
Released: August 25, 2016