Court File and Parties
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
RE: Prolink Broker Network Inc., Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
AND:
Rakesh (Rick) Jaitley et al., Defendants
BEFORE: R.F. Goldstein J.
COUNSEL: Richard Quance, for the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
Raul Shastri, for the Defendants/Plaintiff by Counterclaim
HEARD: In chambers January 28, 2016
ENDORSEMENT regarding costs re-hearing
1This matter concerned a contract between an insurance network and a member broker. On July 2, 3013 I granted judgment to the Plaintiff, Prolink: Prolink Broker Network v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, [2013] O.J. No. 3065. On October 3, 2013 I released my reasons for judgment in respect of damages: Prolink Broker Network v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 6253, [2013] O.J. No. 4542. On November 24, 315 the Divisional Court reversed my damages award: 2015 ONSC 6484, [2015] O.J. No. 6108 (Div.Ct.). The Divisional Court remitted the matter back to me to determine damages in accordance with the principles set out in its judgment.
2After consultation with counsel for the parties, a timetable was agreed upon. This endorsement memorializes the following schedule:
The Plaintiff will have 60 days to deliver a valuation report to the Defendant.
The Defendant will have 45 days to deliver a responding valuation report to the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff will then have 30 days to deliver a reply report to the Defendant, if it so chooses.
3Once reports are exchanged, the parties are to contact me through my assistant for a date for the damages re-hearing.
4The parties are encouraged to continue to engage in settlement discussions.
R.F. Goldstein J.
Date: March 8, 2016