Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Canadian National Railway Co., 1997 CanLII 395 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 5
Canadian National Railway Company Appellant
v.
Burlington Northern Railroad Company Respondent
Indexed as: Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Canadian National Railway Co.
1997: January 21.
Present: La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia
Arbitration ‑‑ Stay of proceedings ‑‑ Arbitration agreement not inoperative ‑‑ Order staying court action restored.
APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1995), 1995 1802 (BC CA), 59 B.C.A.C. 97, 98 W.A.C. 97, 7 B.C.L.R. (3d) 80, 20 B.L.R. (2d) 145, allowing the respondent’s appeal from an order of Thackray J., [1993] B.C.J. No. 2975, [1995] B.C.W.L.D. 2252, granting an application for a stay of proceedings. Appeal allowed.
Douglas W. Lahay, for the appellant.
Richard R. E. DeFilippi, for the respondent.
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1La Forest J. ‑‑ We are all of the view that the appeal should be allowed for the reasons given by Cumming J.A., the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is set aside and the order of Thackray J., pronounced December 3, 1993, staying the action, is restored. The appellant is entitled to its costs in this Court and in the Court of Appeal.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Clark, Wilson, Vancouver.
Solicitors for the respondent: Douglas, Symes & Brissenden, Vancouver.