The appellant appealed a motion judge's decision dismissing his motion to change child support.
He argued the motion judge erred by failing to impute income to the respondent and by refusing to order her to pay a proportionate share of his childcare and transportation costs.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the motion judge's application of the test for intentional under-employment or in the finding that the childcare costs were neither necessary nor reasonable.
