The applicant brought a motion for the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home.
The respondent opposed the sale and brought a cross-motion for exclusive possession and an order transferring the home to their adult son for a fixed price.
The court granted the applicant's motion, finding that the applicant had a prima facie right to sale and the respondent failed to establish a reasonable need to delay the sale for the benefit of the adult children.
The court also dismissed the cross-motion to transfer the home to the son, noting it lacked jurisdiction to compel a sale to a specific party or grant a right of first refusal.
