The respondent brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the applicant's claims for retroactive child support, equalization of net family property, and a resulting trust over her pension.
The court dismissed the claim for retroactive child support because the adult child was no longer a student and therefore not a 'child of the marriage' when the application was commenced.
The equalization claim was dismissed because it was a claim provable in bankruptcy and was extinguished when the respondent was discharged from bankruptcy.
The resulting trust claim was dismissed for lack of factual foundation.
The applicant's claim for a divorce order was permitted to proceed.