The defendant sought to stay proceedings and a decade-old summary judgment obtained by the plaintiff for a credit card debt, along with the seizure and sale of her property.
The defendant argued for an adjournment to review the case due to new information about her former lawyer's professional misconduct and alleged delay by the plaintiff in enforcing the judgment.
The court dismissed the motion, finding no grounds for an adjournment or to set aside, vary, or stay the judgment, noting the plaintiff had properly renewed its writ of seizure and sale and the defendant's recourse, if any, was against her former lawyer.
Costs were awarded to the plaintiff.
