The applicant sought judicial review of WSIAT decisions that dismissed his appeals regarding the quantification of his benefits for a workplace knee injury.
The applicant raised numerous procedural and substantive objections, including allegations of Charter and human rights violations, bias, and unreasonable findings of fact.
The Divisional Court applied the reasonableness standard and dismissed the application, finding that the WSIAT's procedures were fair, its jurisdictional findings were correct, and its factual determinations were reasonable given the evidence and the applicant's refusal to participate in an oral hearing.
