The appellants and respondents are adjoining neighbours involved in a dispute over a parking easement on the respondents' property.
The appellants appealed a summary judgment order that limited their parking to a single vehicle and required them to park so as not to restrict the respondents' backyard access.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the motion judge correctly interpreted the original grant of easement and the surrounding circumstances, which indicated an intention to create a right to park only one vehicle.
The respondents' cross-appeal on costs was also dismissed.
