The plaintiff brought a motion to strike three jury notices prior to the commencement of a trial involving a complex motor vehicle accident resulting in catastrophic impairments.
The plaintiff argued that the anticipated evidence, including competing expert opinions and the plaintiff's brain injury, would be too complex for a jury.
The court dismissed the motion as premature, applying the 'wait and see' approach, holding that it was speculative to determine the complexity of the evidence before it was presented at trial.
