The plaintiff and defendants brought cross-motions regarding the sufficiency of answers to undertakings and refusals from examinations for discovery in a construction lien action.
The court ordered the defendants to provide further and better answers to several undertakings, finding their previous responses incomplete or non-responsive.
The court declined to order the production of the defendants' general ledgers and bank statements at this stage.
The defendants' motion to compel further answers from the plaintiff was dismissed, as the court found the plaintiff had either answered the undertakings or the defendants' follow-up questions exceeded the scope of the original undertakings.
