The appellants appealed an order setting aside their third party claims against the plaintiff's employer and disability insurer.
The appellants argued that the third parties should be bound by the determination of issues in the main action to prevent inconsistent findings under Rule 29.01(c).
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants had no cause of action against the employer and that the possibility of inconsistent findings in subsequent litigation against the insurer was too speculative and contingent.
