The respondent, Dario Jackson, brought a motion to dismiss the application of the applicant, Thea Jackson, for divorce and child support, arguing lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and failure to rebut his "affidavit of fact." The court rejected all arguments, finding it had jurisdiction under the Divorce Act and Constitution Act, 1867, and that the applicant's claims were properly before the court.
The court characterized the respondent's arguments as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments (OPCA) and dismissed the motion.
