The defendants brought a motion to strike portions of the plaintiff's statement of claim in an employment dispute over unpaid commissions, and sought to make an interlocutory injunction permanent.
The court also addressed the distribution of materials seized under an Anton Piller order.
The court declined to make the injunction permanent, finding the test was not met and damages would be an adequate remedy.
The court refused to strike the claims for unpaid commissions based on the limitation period, as discoverability was a genuine issue for trial.
However, the court struck the claims for negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation and loss of future income, granting the plaintiff leave to amend.
