The parties brought competing motions regarding parenting and child support for their three-year-old child.
The respondent father sought to vary an interim parenting order to a shared 2-2-3 schedule based on an untested Section 30 assessment report, while the applicant mother sought child support and contribution to daycare expenses.
The court dismissed the father's request for shared parenting, finding it premature and noting the mother had not received the full assessment file, but slightly expanded the father's parenting time.
The court ordered the father to pay child support based on an income of $111,801, which included banked vacation pay, and to pay 69% of daycare expenses after imputing an income of $50,000 to the mother due to a lack of medical evidence supporting her disability claim.
