3 total
Court issues procedural directions to self-represented applicant for resolving disputes over transcript accuracy.
In a case management endorsement, the court provided procedural directions to a self-represented applicant regarding disputes over the accuracy of transcripts and the Record of Proceedings.
The court ordered the applicant to prepare detailed lists of alleged errors and proposed corrections, and directed the respondents to reply to those lists.
The court noted that the intense case management required by the self-represented applicant's lack of trust in the respondents would inevitably cause delays.
Case management endorsement addressing procedural issues and the Record of Proceedings for a judicial review application.
A case management conference was held for an application for judicial review of a WSIAT decision.
The self-represented applicants' amended notice of application was accepted without further amendment.
The court addressed procedural issues, including the preparation of the Record of Proceedings, the unavailability of video recordings of the WSIAT hearing, and the procedure for introducing fresh evidence.
WSIAT agreed to compile and serve the Record of Proceedings, and a further case management conference was to be scheduled.
Judicial review of arbitration award dismissed; no procedural unfairness in finding willful neglect over sabotage.
The applicant union sought judicial review of an arbitrator's decision upholding an employee's termination for failing to maintain equipment and falsifying records.
The union argued it was denied procedural fairness because the arbitrator based the decision on willful neglect rather than deliberate sabotage.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the employer had clearly argued willful neglect before the arbitrator and the union had ample opportunity to respond.
