Rose Leto

The plaintiffs brought a basket motion in writing for non-party disclosure under Rule 30.10.

The court previously declined to grant the order due to evidentiary deficiencies regarding the consent or non-opposition of the non-parties and defendants.

The plaintiffs filed supplementary evidence addressing these concerns to the court's satisfaction.

The plaintiffs brought a motion in writing under Rule 30.10 for production of police and Crown records relating to a motor vehicle accident.

The draft order submitted differed significantly from the relief sought in the notice of motion, and the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence that the defendants or the non-parties consented to or did not oppose the requested relief.

The court declined to sign the draft order, noting that a motion in writing under Rule 37.12.1 requires confirmation of consent or non-opposition, but allowed the plaintiffs to file supplementary material to cure the deficiencies.