The applicant objected to the admissibility of three audio tape cassettes, arguing they were disclosed during a confidential mediation and were irrelevant.
The respondents argued the tapes were relevant and referenced in the applicant's Reply.
The Tribunal found that two of the tapes were admissible because the applicant's Reply referenced 'other taped conversations', making their existence relevant despite being disclosed at mediation.
The third tape was ruled inadmissible as it pertained to a conversation months after the applicant's resignation and was irrelevant.
