The defendant brought a motion for security for costs against the corporate plaintiff under Rule 56.01(1)(d).
The plaintiff opposed, arguing impecuniosity caused by the defendant's failure to pay outstanding invoices.
The court found the plaintiff failed to establish impecuniosity due to insufficient financial disclosure.
However, the court dismissed the motion, finding the plaintiff had a good chance of success on the merits and that its financial difficulties were largely caused by the defendant's refusal to pay approved invoices.
