The applicant alleged that the respondent condominium corporation breached a settlement agreement regarding visitor parking rules.
The applicant claimed the corporation failed to provide required written notice to owners, proposed a new rule that contradicted the settlement, and delayed reimbursing owners for cancelled parking tickets.
The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the corporation's notice satisfied the settlement terms and the proposed rule did not contravene the agreement.
While the reimbursements were delayed, the Tribunal found this breach to be minor and moot.
The application was dismissed without costs.