The appellant Indian band sought a declaration that a permit granting a right-of-way for an electric power transmission line across its reserve was void.
The permit, issued under s. 28(2) of the Indian Act, was granted for 'such period of time as the right-of-way is required'.
The band argued that this indefinite period amounted to a permanent alienation requiring a formal surrender under s. 37 of the Act.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that the permit was validly issued under s. 28(2), as the duration of the easement, while indeterminate, was bounded by an ascertainable event (when the line is no longer required) and did not constitute a grant in perpetuity.
