The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment for debt secured by a mortgage against the corporate defendant and on a guarantee against the individual defendants.
The corporate defendant and two individual defendants did not defend the action.
One individual defendant filed a statement of defence relying on Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments (OPCA).
The court found the OPCA arguments to be frivolous and an abuse of process, noting they did not dispute the debt or amounts owing.
Summary judgment was granted to the plaintiff, with substantial indemnity costs awarded against the corporation and the defending individual.
