The applicant applied for termination of construction industry bargaining rights.
The respondent union argued the applicant lacked standing because he was not at work on the application date, rendering the application a nullity.
The applicant sought to add two other employees who were at work on the application date as party applicants.
The Board held that although the original applicant lacked standing, the application was not a nullity.
The Board exercised its discretion under Rules 79 and 84 to add the two other petitioners as applicants, allowing the application to proceed.
