The plaintiffs sought leave to appeal an interlocutory order that transferred the action's venue from Toronto to Belleville and required the plaintiffs to pay consulting fees into court pursuant to a security agreement.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave, finding no conflicting decisions on the venue transfer and no reason to doubt the correctness of the motions judge's application of section 67 of the Personal Property Security Act.
The court held that the proposed appeal did not involve matters of public importance.
