The appellant, an off-duty police officer, was convicted of impaired driving causing death and bodily harm following a motor vehicle collision.
He appealed his convictions, arguing the trial judge erred by refusing to give a special jury instruction on the frailties of eyewitness confidence, and that his Charter rights were violated during the seizure of blood and breath samples.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding the jury instruction was unnecessary and the evidence was lawfully obtained.
The appellant's sentence appeal seeking a conditional sentence or reduced term from his 21-month imprisonment was also dismissed.