The parties brought cross-motions regarding the enforcement of a 2017 consent order requiring the sale of three assets: a jointly owned cottage, and the respondent's business and commercial property.
The applicant sought the appointment of a Receiver/Manager to sell all three assets due to the respondent's alleged failure to sell them.
The court declined to appoint a receiver for the cottage, ordering the applicant to list it immediately.
However, the court appointed a Receiver/Manager for the business and commercial property, finding special circumstances existed because the applicant had no other means to force the sale and the respondent lacked incentive to sell.
