The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the respondent's service manager to revoke her rent-geared-to-income housing subsidy.
The applicant had been granted the subsidy by a property manager without following proper procedures, a fact unknown to the applicant.
The Divisional Court found that the respondent failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness by not giving her an opportunity to comment under section 80 of the Social Housing Reform Act, 2000, and by having the same person who participated in the original decision conduct the review, contrary to section 58(2) of Ontario Regulation 298/01.
The decision was set aside and remitted for reconsideration by a different decision-maker.
