The applicant and respondent separated in 2008 and sought resolution of issues relating to custody, access, child support, and equalization.
The court granted a divorce and ordered an equalization payment to the applicant.
The court awarded sole custody and primary residence of the child to the applicant, finding that the respondent's involvement in a large-scale drug operation and his inconsistent evidence regarding his income and employment raised significant concerns about his ability to provide a stable home.
The court imputed an income of $50,000 to the respondent for child support purposes due to his failure to provide reliable income information and ordered him to pay ongoing and retroactive child support.
