The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that denied her entitlement to an Income Replacement Benefit.
The applicant argued that the Tribunal breached procedural fairness by ignoring medical records and erred in law by improperly weighing expert evidence from a psychiatrist versus a psychologist and chiropractor.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding no breach of procedural fairness as all evidence was reviewed, and holding that the weighing of expert evidence within their scope of practice is the role of the trier of fact and not grounds for reconsideration.
