The applicants sought leave to appeal a costs order made by a motions judge following a consent order settling an estate administration dispute.
The motions judge had fixed costs based on written submissions, awarding the applicants $20,000 and the respondents $15,000.
The applicants argued the judge erred by not awarding full indemnity costs and by not reviewing the entire court file.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave, finding no error in principle in the motions judge's exercise of discretion and no conflicting decisions or matters of general importance to justify leave.
