The accused was charged with driving over the legal limit after reversing her vehicle into a parked truck.
At trial, the accused raised several Charter challenges, arguing her s. 10(b) rights were violated because she spoke to a paralegal instead of a lawyer, and challenging the officer's reasonable suspicion, note-taking, and the 'forthwith' requirement for the breath demand.
The court dismissed all Charter applications, finding the officer acted in good faith in facilitating the call to the paralegal, had sufficient grounds for reasonable suspicion, and made the demand promptly.
The accused was found guilty.
