The applicant mother brought a motion for production of financial records from family corporations controlled by the respondent father's mother, a non-party, to determine the father's income for support purposes.
The father brought a cross-motion to reduce interim child and spousal support, claiming a reduction in income due to health issues.
The court ordered the non-party to produce the requested corporate records, finding them relevant and necessary for the mother's expert to complete an income analysis.
The father's cross-motion to vary support was dismissed as premature, without prejudice to renew after the corporate records are fully produced.
