The applicant father brought an application to determine his income for the purpose of calculating retroactive and prospective child support.
The respondent mother disputed the father's reported income, arguing that he had failed to report all income sources and had deducted unreasonable personal expenses through his corporations.
The court reviewed the expert valuation report and found that while the father reported income from all sources, he had improperly deducted personal expenses for his residence and vehicle.
Consequently, the court adjusted the personal use allocations for rent to 75% and vehicle expenses to 50%, ordering a recalculation of the father's income and child support arrears.