The defendants brought a motion for security for costs against the plaintiff, a real estate brokerage, which admitted having insufficient assets in Ontario to cover a potential costs award, though its shareholders were not impecunious.
The court, applying a holistic approach under Rule 56.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, determined that it was just to order security for costs.
The plaintiff's claim was found to be arguable but not demonstrated to have a good chance of success on the merits.
The court granted the motion, ordering the plaintiff to post $60,000 for one group of defendants and $45,000 for another, covering the pleading and discovery stages, and awarded motion costs to the successful defendants.