The accused pleaded guilty to sexual assault but subsequently brought an application to strike the plea prior to sentencing.
He argued the plea was involuntary due to the stress of being arrested on outstanding warrants and uninformed because he did not fully appreciate the immigration consequences, specifically the risk of deportation.
The court dismissed the application, finding the accused had the cognitive capacity to make a volitional choice and was explicitly warned by counsel and the court about potential immigration consequences but chose to proceed anyway.
The court declined to exercise its discretion to strike the plea, concluding there was no miscarriage of justice.
