The plaintiffs brought a motion to enforce a prior judgment granting permanent injunctions against the defendant for a years-long campaign of internet harassment and defamation.
The plaintiffs sought orders to remove new defamatory publications that came to their attention after the original summary judgment motions were argued.
The defendant opposed the motion, arguing the court was functus officio and raising other procedural objections.
The court rejected the defendant's arguments, holding that while it is functus officio regarding the claims decided in the judgment, it retains jurisdiction to enforce its orders.
The motion was granted.
